Pages

Saturday, 2 November 2013

No way to treat women



Today, we placed this ad in the Irish Times to urge the Irish government to stop washing its hands of the 4,000 women who have to travel to Britain to access abortion care every year. 
 
We have treated many thousands of women from Ireland since the 8th Amendment to the Irish Constitution banning abortion was passed in 1983.

The Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act, which has still not come into force, will do nothing to help the women we see in our clinics every day. Irish women come to our clinics with their own very personal set of circumstances – from contraception failure on the eve of university to a serious problem being diagnosed with a much longed for pregnancy. But they are united in the fact that their lives and predicaments are wilfully ignored by the political establishment, which at the same time relies on Britain to ensure no-one has to live with the consequences of forcing women to bear children they feel unable to care for.

Because they have had to make the arrangements and find the funding for travel and treatment, their abortions are often carried out further into their pregnancies than those for women in England. Nearly a third of abortions for women from Ireland are carried out at 10 weeks and later, compared with just over a fifth of abortions for women from England. Abortion is an extremely safe procedure and much safer than childbirth, but the earlier it can be performed the lower any risk to women.

Banning abortion does not end it. Women will always find ways to end unwanted pregnancies – whether traveling to bpas or buying pills on the internet. Abortion is as much a fact of life for women in Cork as for women in Coventry or Carlisle. The women we see from Ireland are just like those from England – but made more desperate by the financial and emotional cost of having to travel. No politician, in a civilised country, should force women to make a journey abroad for abortion care. The decision alone is a tough enough journey.

bpas clinics provide the best of care – but women need clinics in Ireland. Until that happens we’re proud to help.

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

Dignity in Childbirth

Last week, we attended Birthrights’ Dignity Forum, the event which launched their campaign to promote Dignity in Childbirth.

It is incredibly important that women are treated with respect and given support, information and choice in childbirth -we see women whose experience of birth, in particular those who suffer from birth trauma, impacts on their decision whether or not to continue with a subsequent pregnancy.

The conference explored the varied experience of women in childbirth, both across UK and globally, set childbirth rights in the context of human rights law, and pointed to work that needs to be done to improve the care and support offered to women at this point in their lives.

Why dignity in birth matters

Professor Lesley Page, President of the Royal College of Midwives, opened the conference by setting out very clearly that dignity in birth matters because it is bound up in better outcomes. Respect, kindness and consideration ensure that the care provided is right for each individual woman, leading to better physical and emotional outcomes for the woman, baby and family.

Dignity can be provided by simple actions such as medical staff introducing themselves or knocking before entering a private room. However, services have been hit by both a birth rate increase that has far outstripped any rise in midwife numbers, and also an increase in the number of women presenting with complex healthcare needs, such as those with high BMIs. This is making it more difficult for midwives to always be able to deliver the service they want to provide for women.

Professor Page acknowledged that the survey does indicate there is a distance to go to ensure choice, control and dignity in childbirth – but she stressed that maternity service workers are passionate about raising standards, and are already working hard to achieve this.

Dignity in childbirth is a human right

It was incredibly useful to hear childbirth discussed in the context of human rights. Helen Mountfield QC argued that whilst dignity may seem like an elusive concept, hard to pin down, it is at the heart of human rights with Article 1 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that "all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights." Helen Wildbore of the British Institute of Human Rights also outlined the ways provisions in the Human Rights Act are applicable to childbirth, from Article 3 which prohibits inhumane or degrading treatment to Article 8 which protects the right to respect for private and family life.Yet despite dignity being a core right, it can prove difficult to exercise. Helen Mountfield QC argued that this was particularly true for women, who can unfortunately be used to being told that what they need or want to actualise their choices just isn't available. In our experience, this is certainly true with regards to a range of reproductive healthcare options, from what type of contraception women are able to access to their choice of where to give birth.

Respectful treatment and maternal health globally

The White Ribbon Alliance presented their Respectful Maternity Care campaign video, which we really recommend watching, and spoke about their Universal Rights of Childbearing Women Charter.

Childbirth is the biggest killer of women globally but real progress is being made - over the last ten years the rates of maternal mortality have halved. But, as Brigid McConville of the WRA said, “we need to reach the other half.”

Respectful care can play a vital role in reducing maternal mortality rates as fear and distrust of medical professionals acts a huge barrier to women attending health centres. Stories of abuse, such as women being held against their will because they were unable to pay for their care or being forcibly shaved during labour, have, understandably, an incredibly negative impact on women’s decision to use maternity care services. As fear can be a more powerful deterrent than geographical and finical obstacles, respectful care must be a priority to in the drive to reduce maternal mortality rates globally.

Choice in birth and the C-section question

The issue of choice in birth was central to the Dignity in Childbirth survey. The survey found that only 68% of women were given a choice of where to give birth, 31% of women said that they did not feel in control of their birth experience and 15% of women were unhappy with the availability of pain relief. The survey did find overall women that women were satisfied with the care they received, yet there were a significant variations and areas of concern.

Only half of the women surveyed said that they had the birth they wanted. Whilst a greater proportion of women who had caesarean sections reported they did not have the birth they wanted (64% of those surveyed), it would be useful to see more research in to this which differentiates between women’s experience of planned and emergency c-sections.

Pauline Hull, co-author of Choosing Cesarean, A Natural Birth Plan and editor of electivecesarean.com , raised the importance of this distinction in questions about caesareans. In her presentation, she suggested that dignity, respect and support are very much absent from discussions around elective c-sections. This is a rational birth choice that should be campaigned for by those who want to ensure dignity in childbirth for women, Hull argued. It was positive to hear from many speakers that choice should be at the centre of all discussions around childbirth, and that more must be done to ensure that women are able to exercise their autonomy at this time.

As Carrie Longton, the co-founder of Mumsnet, said during her presentation, birth is not the most important thing about becoming a parent, but it is a moment in a mother’s life and in her baby’s life that they will never be able to change. The idea that “as long as the baby is healthy that’s all that matters” is simply not true. Women need to feel part of the decision making process, they should have their views respected, and they should be able to make the choices that are right for them. They deserve nothing less.

Friday, 20 September 2013

Trusting women is the right choice for politicians of all parties

This is a post by our Chief Executive Ann Furedi in advance of our fringe events at Labour Party conference in Brighton on Tuesday 24th September at 12:45pm, and Conservative Party conference in Manchester on Monday 30th September at 1pm. Both events are open to all and not just for those attending the conferences.


State support is vital to family life. Women, especially, know this. Without access to reliable, affordable childcare, women can’t work. Without access to contraception and abortion women, can’t plan to have the number of children they want, or when to have them. Without access to good schools, women can’t ensure that their children will get the education they need. We all need social resources to draw on, and the more impoverished, excluded and disadvantaged we are, the more support we may need. But our need for resources does not confer a right or an obligation to meddle in the personal decisions we choose to make for ourselves and our families.

Today, some politicians and policy makers seem to assume that people, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds, can’t be trusted to do what is right. And so increasingly policies are introduced that ‘nudge’ people towards what appropriate professionals decide are the ‘right’ choices, and away from the ‘wrong’ ones. This causes problems: what seems to be a quick-fix policy to influence behaviour can turn into a short-cut to calamity for individuals.

British Pregnancy Advisory Service (bpas) runs clinics and advisory centres that provide counselling and care for more than 60,000 women each trying to avoid or manage problem pregnancies. We see the impact of playing politics with people’s personal decision-making when it impacts on their sexual and reproductive health.

We see young women pregnant because their doctors, encouraged by targets intended to increase uptake of long-acting (super-effective) methods of contraception, have persuaded them to accept an implant which they didn’t really want and, having had it removed, are reluctant to go back for the (less effective, but good enough) pills they preferred.

We see new mothers pregnant because healthcare workers have exaggerated the contraceptive effects of breastfeeding in the drive to encourage women to resist formula feeding.

We see women pregnant unintentionally having become convinced they are infertile after  being subjected to exaggerated accounts of the risks posed by common infections, such as chlamydia, by campaigns trying to  scare them into ‘sexual responsibility’

We see the fallout of initiatives to deter heavy drinking in pregnancy that advise pregnant women to avoid alcohol altogether in the belief that women are unable to gauge their own alcohol consumption: women so terrified they have harmed their fetus they consider abortion.

We suffer interference from a few politicians convinced that women are incapable of making informed, personally-intelligent choices about whether to continue their pregnancy without the involvement of an ‘independent’ outsider to counsel them.

Women need evidence-based information on which to base their choices. Our message this year to politicians of all parties is this: tell people the naked truth and trust them to make decisions for themselves. When it comes to reproductive choices women are the ones best placed to make their own decisions, from what contraception she uses to prevent unwanted pregnancy to how she gives birth to a much wanted baby. Trusting women is the right choice for all of us.

Wednesday, 11 September 2013

The fertility "clock strikes 12" at 35

Today there has been another wave of articles generated from the latest “fertility time bomb” warning from reproductive scientists. However, we are concerned that these admonitions are issued in a way that completely ignores the reality of women’s lives and the very understandable reasons why women are choosing to have children later in their thirties. 

In our experience there are many factors which lead women to delay starting their families into their thirties. Career pressures may be among them, but this is often closely related to women wanting financial security before having a baby, and indeed their own home. The importance of being in the right relationship is for many women paramount, as few want to take on the responsibility of parenthood with a partner they are unsure about.

We also need to be wary of overstating the risks of later motherhood. If anything many women now overestimate the difficulties of getting pregnant after the age of 35 - we see many women in this age group with unplanned pregnancies after taking chances with contraception because they believed their fertility had declined dramatically. We need to work harder to understand the reasons for later motherhood and not scaremonger or stigmatise those who make the rational and considered choice to delay starting their families until they are ready.

The Politics of Motherhood - bpas fringe events at Labour and Conservative Party Conferences


This year, we will be holding events at Labour and Conservative Party Conferences looking at the politics of motherhood.

Women's decisions about when they should have children, how they should have them and what they should do when they do have them seem increasingly subject to public scrutiny. What role can policymakers play in supporting women's choices and how far can they go?

All are welcome to join bpas and our panel to explore the politics of motherhood today.

Both events are outside the secure zones so you do not need a conference pass to attend.

Labour Party Conference

The Politics of Motherhood : Are Labour doing enough to support women's choices?

12:45pm, Tuesday 24th September
Gresham Suite, The Old Ship Hotel, Kings Road, Brighton, BN1 1NR
Refreshments provided

Speakers include: Kate Green MP, Shadow Minister for Women and Equalities
                            Clare Murphy, bpas
                            Emma Burnell, Scarlet Standard blog
                            Glosswitch, New Statesman
                            Scarlet Harris, TUC Women's Equality Officer (Chair)

Join the event on Facebook event here

Conservative Party Conference

The Politics of Motherhood : Are the Conservatives doing enough to support women's choices?

1pm, Monday 30th September
Richter Room, Radisson Blu Edwardian Hotel, Peter St, Manchester, M2 5GP
Refreshments provided 

Speakers include: Claire Perry MP
                            Ann Furedi, bpas
                            Eleanor Mills, Sunday Times
                            Jennifer Howze, Brit Mums
                            Cathy Warwick, Royal College of Midwives (Chair)

Join the event on Facebook here

If you have any questions about either of the events, please email katherine.o'brien@bpas.org

Thursday, 5 September 2013

Jeremy Hunt should concern himself with real issues facing women needing abortion care, not fabricated ones.

The Crown Prosecution Service, CPS, has announced that it will not be prosecuting two doctors accused of agreeing to arrange abortions on the basis of gender and released a detailed statement explaining their decision. In response, the Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said the decision was "concerning" and has demanded "urgent clarification." 

However, it is hard to see how pursuing these cases would serve any public interest, not least given that both incidents were the result of a sting operation organised by anti-abortion newspaper. In our experience, the only women requesting abortion on the basis of gender alone are undercover journalists. 

Recently collated figures by the Department of Health show the UK's gender ratio is well within the normal boundaries for a population. We would suggest that the Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt, who has asked for "urgent clarification" of the decision not to prosecute, concern himself with real and pressing issues facing women needing contraception and abortion care rather than fabricated ones.
 

Thursday, 18 July 2013

Working Together for Women

On Wednesday 10th July we held our second networking event for those working in and around the women’s sector. It was great that the real diversity of the women’s sector was represented, with campaigners against domestic violence, those working with disabled young women and organisations supporting single parents attending.

The theme of the event was ‘Working Together for Women’. The women’s sector is facing an incredibly difficult time, but collaboration can enable organisations to support each other and strengthen each other’s work. The event allowed us to meet, discuss current projects, challenges and look at ways we could work together more in the future.
 
 
The first of our two speakers was Kat Banyard. Kat discussed the ways her organisation UK Feminista brings together the expertise that already exists in the sector and those campaigning at a grassroots level to drive forward women’s equality. The UK Feminista Feminist Lobby of Parliament is one example. The lobby was supported by an alliance of organisations working on various issues and campaigns. The benefit of joining together in this way was that it signalled to politicians that we can’t separate women’s issues – they are interconnected, and can span across sex education and sexual violence, to the way women are portrayed  in lads’ mags and the representation of women in parliament. Furthermore, by bringing together so many voices, the lobby sent a powerful message to MPs - that feminism should be at the heart of politics.
 
 
Katy Taylor of the Aya Project, itself a partnership project between Women’s Aid and Imkaan, explained the need for more collaboration between bigger and smaller organisations in the current climate. Funding cuts have put huge pressure on the women’s sector and we know that to save costs  some commissioners are looking for one size fits all service provision. However, this approach will only exclude the most marginalised communities who already face huge barriers when accessing services. It is crucial that we work together to ensure that the tendering environment doesn’t create a marketplace that excludes the smaller organisations - as well as the women that need their expertise.  And in such partnerships, we shouldn’t assume that the larger organisation must automatically take the lead. Collaboration is not without its difficulties, but Katy explained that the key was to be led by the needs of the service users at all times.  


We know that some of those attending are already in discussion about working together on future projects and we hope that the event will spark some partnerships.

We are planning another similar event later in the year. If you are interested in attending and didn’t make it to this event or have any thoughts about a potential topic for the event please do get in touch: katherine.o’brien@bpas.org