Yesterday, National Institute for Health and Care
Excellence (Nice) produced new guidance stating that young women should be
allowed to keep emergency contraception at home, so they have immediate access
to it if they need it. Nice also called for the morning-after pill to be
available free of charge to all women under 25.
Yet there has been the inevitable outcry from certain
politicians and journalists – a reaction which Clegg described as being based on
out-dated "medieval" attitudes towards women.
The Deputy Prime Minister said "I am absolutely
appalled and really very angry on behalf of many, many women across the country
about the suggestion that giving a woman the right to buy a morning-after pill
will somehow automatically lead to more promiscuous behaviour.
"I think it is demeaning, I think it is patronising,
I think it is sexist.
"Women don't take a morning-after pill lightly. It
is not something you casually do. To say to a woman she can't have the right,
in case she has unprotected sex, to have a morning-after pill available because
we - the Government, society or whichever newspaper columnist is pontificating
about this - think she will suddenly become terribly promiscuous, I think is an
absolute insult to women across the country.
"I believe the experts, who have quite clearly said
that providing the morning-after pill and other forms of contraception - the
evidence is very clear - doesn't lead to more promiscuous behaviour. It does
help prevent unwanted pregnancies.
"This is lifting the lid on a really fundamental
difference in attitudes towards women. Women shouldn't be told 'We are not
going to give you the freedom to buy something from a chemist because we don't
trust how you will behave sexually'. It's a Victorian - worse than that,
medieval - approach to women."
Nick Clegg said that doctors should encourage girls under
16 who are considering contrac eption to talk to their parents, but that :
"At the end of the day, when you are faced with the reality of a teenager
who is in trouble, you as a medical expert want to help them, and I think for
us to decree that they can or can't help someone isn't going to alter the fact
that that 16-year-old is in trouble.
"I don't want to see teenagers - or anybody, it at
all possible - suffering an unwanted pregnancy. I don't want to see the very
high rates we have had in the past of unwanted pregnancies.
"The way to deal with that is to make sure we go
with the evidence that if you provide people with education and information and
make contraception available on a responsible basis, that is the way we stop unwanted
pregnancies, not by resorting to really out-dated attitudes towards
women."
We agree with Nick.
No comments:
Post a Comment